Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FZ35
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Renewed by Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ38
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Nikon A900 versus Panasonic FZ35, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and FZ35 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe A900 was launched 5 years after the FZ35 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Nikon A900 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the A900 matches up vs the FZ35 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Panasonic FZ35
| A900 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 |  | July 2010 | Newer by 69 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Nikon A900
| FZ35 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Panasonic FZ35
| A900 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Nikon A900 has got physical dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ35 has specifications of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
See the Nikon A900 versus Panasonic FZ35 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the A900 and the FZ35.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the A900 and FZ35 is 88 and 72 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing technical specs. The pic below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and FZ35.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Nikon A900 to deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher A900 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Panasonic |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.50 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lbs) | 397 grams (0.88 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $400 | $999 |