Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZR3
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50


94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Launched February 2016
- Replacement is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-ZX3

Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Nikon A900 versus Panasonic ZR3, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and ZR3 (14MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The A900 was manufactured 6 years later than the ZR3 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the A900 scores against the ZR3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon A900 Gallery & Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Panasonic ZR3
A900 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 74 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Nikon A900
ZR3 | A900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Panasonic ZR3
A900 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon A900 comes with external dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZR3 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon A900 versus Panasonic ZR3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the A900 versus the ZR3.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the A900 and ZR3 is 88 and 94 respectively.

Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking specifications. The graphic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the A900 and ZR3.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Nikon A900 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer A900 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon A900 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix A900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Panasonic |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-02-23 | 2010-01-26 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.30 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 289 gr (0.64 pounds) | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $280 |