Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Refreshed by Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe A900 was brought out 2 years later than the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a short summation of how the A900 matches up vs the WG-4 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| A900 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | February 2014 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Nikon A900
| WG-4 GPS | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| A900 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon A900 features outside dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the A900 versus the WG-4 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and WG-4 GPS is 88 and 90 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Nikon A900 to provide greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent A900 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 240 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $210 |