Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50


90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Refreshed by Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-6

Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Below is a extended overview of the Nikon A900 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Nikon and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

The A900 was brought out 13 months later than the WG-5 GPS making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the A900 scores vs the WG-5 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon A900 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
A900 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | February 2015 | More recent by 13 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Nikon A900
WG-5 GPS | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
A900 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon A900 offers exterior measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Nikon A900 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the A900 compared to the WG-5 GPS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and WG-5 GPS is 88 and 90 respectively.

Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the A900 and WG-5 GPS.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Nikon A900 to render extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger A900 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon A900 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix A900 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lb) | 236 gr (0.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 240 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $400 | $500 |