Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ35W
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Replacement is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Nikon A900 versus Samsung HZ35W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Nikon and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe A900 was released 5 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the A900 grades versus the HZ35W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung HZ35W
| A900 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | June 2010 | Fresher by 70 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 614k | Clearer screen (+307k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Nikon A900
| HZ35W | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung HZ35W
| A900 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon A900 has outside measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon A900 versus Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the A900 and the HZ35W.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the A900 and HZ35W is 88 and 91 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The photograph underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the A900 and HZ35W.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon A900 to provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern A900 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Alternate name | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $300 |