Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ50W
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
70 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Released February 2016
- Later Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Released May 2010
- Other Name is WB5500
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ50W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and HZ50W (14MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A900 was manufactured 5 years after the HZ50W which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Nikon A900 being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the A900 matches up vs the HZ50W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Samsung HZ50W. The entire galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung HZ50W
| A900 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 |  | May 2010 | More modern by 71 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Nikon A900
| HZ50W | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung HZ50W
| A900 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Nikon A900 enjoys exterior measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has dimensions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ50W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the A900 vs the HZ50W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and HZ50W is 88 and 70 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The pic here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the A900 and HZ50W.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Nikon A900 to show extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer A900 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon A900 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung HZ50W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung HZ50W |
| Also called | - | WB5500 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2016-02-23 | 2010-05-03 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 lb) | 426g (0.94 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $250 |