Nikon A900 vs Samsung MV800
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
97 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
Nikon A900 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Replacement is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Launched September 2011
Photography Glossary Nikon A900 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Nikon A900 versus Samsung MV800, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and MV800 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe A900 was announced 4 years after the MV800 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the A900 scores vs the MV800 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon A900 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Samsung MV800. The whole galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung MV800
| A900 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 | September 2011 | Newer by 55 months | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Nikon A900
| MV800 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung MV800
| A900 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Nikon A900 has got outer dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Samsung MV800 has dimensions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Nikon A900 versus Samsung MV800 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the A900 against the MV800.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A900 and MV800 is 88 and 97 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through technical specs. The picture here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and MV800.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Nikon A900 to result in greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger A900 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon A900 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung MV800 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 lb) | 121g (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Micro SD |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $400 | $499 |