Nikon A900 vs Samsung PL200
88 Imaging
45 Features
58 Overall
50
94 Imaging
36 Features
22 Overall
30
Nikon A900 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Updated by Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon A900 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Nikon A900 vs Samsung PL200, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and PL200 (14MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A900 was brought out 5 years after the PL200 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the A900 scores vs the PL200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon A900 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Samsung PL200. The entire galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung PL200
| A900 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 69 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Nikon A900
| PL200 | A900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung PL200
| A900 | PL200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Nikon A900 comes with physical dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL200 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon A900 vs Samsung PL200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the A900 vs the PL200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and PL200 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The image here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A900 and PL200.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Nikon A900 to result in more detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more modern A900 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon A900 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung PL200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung PL200 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2010-07-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 pounds) | 170g (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $0 |