Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfe9f/bfe9f9dfbd953cb8bdda2628eee0041960095db6" alt="Nikon Coolpix A900 front Nikon Coolpix A900 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3208c/3208cbdbdd11e23eae5a341ac80491dad70aec44" alt="Samsung TL500 front Samsung TL500 front"
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Replacement is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Also referred to as EX1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Nikon A900 versus Samsung TL500, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the A900 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The A900 was revealed 5 years after the TL500 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the A900 grades versus the TL500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Samsung TL500. The full galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung TL500
A900 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 69 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 614k | Sharper screen (+307k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Nikon A900
TL500 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung TL500
A900 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and size. The Nikon A900 enjoys outer dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has specifications of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Compare the Nikon A900 versus Samsung TL500 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the A900 vs the TL500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26049/260491567c5cc3b7a4d19c1d19dd9a99efc5e2dc" alt="Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 size comparison Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A900 and TL500 is 88 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed2f5/ed2f58e84707fe107a1c1e81d54325f63ea0d38e" alt="Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The image underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and TL500.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The A900 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Nikon A900 will give you extra detail because of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more recent A900 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a0c6/6a0c6fc709d6414f424195bbbb3343d0fa5d566a" alt="Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison"
Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df5e8/df5e871c5d577b4026e1f1c51bf20b0a72491bab" alt="Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Nikon A900 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Samsung |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung TL500 |
Other name | - | EX1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2010-07-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 289g (0.64 lb) | 386g (0.85 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $400 | $527 |