Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB210
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Replacement is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB210, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by competitors Nikon and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and WB210 (14MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe A900 was manufactured 4 years later than the WB210 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the A900 grades vs the WB210 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon A900 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung WB210
| A900 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 56 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 1k | Sharper display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Nikon A900
| WB210 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung WB210
| A900 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon A900 offers outside measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the A900 compared to the WB210.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the A900 and WB210 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the A900 and WB210.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Nikon A900 to result in more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The newer A900 is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lbs) | 174 gr (0.38 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $400 | $279 |