Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB250F
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Later Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB250F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and WB250F (14MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe A900 was introduced 3 years later than the WB250F and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the A900 grades versus the WB250F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung WB250F
| A900 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 39 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Nikon A900
| WB250F | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung WB250F
| A900 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon A900 enjoys outside measurements of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has specifications of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB250F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the A900 versus the WB250F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the A900 and WB250F is 88 and 93 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading through specifications. The photograph here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the A900 and WB250F.
Plainly, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Nikon A900 to give greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer A900 will have an edge in sensor technology.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB250F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lb) | 226 grams (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $400 | $250 |