Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB30F
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB30F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Released February 2016
- Renewed by Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 128g - 98 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB30F Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB30F, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and WB30F (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A900 was brought out 3 years later than the WB30F and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the A900 scores vs the WB30F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB30F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Samsung WB30F. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery and Samsung WB30F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung WB30F
| A900 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 |  | January 2013 | Fresher by 39 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB30F over the Nikon A900
| WB30F | A900 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung WB30F
| A900 | WB30F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB30F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon A900 provides outside dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Samsung WB30F has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB30F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the A900 and the WB30F.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A900 and WB30F is 88 and 96 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB30F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by viewing technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and WB30F.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Nikon A900 to render extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer A900 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB30F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB30F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB30F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB30F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2016-02-23 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 pounds) | 128g (0.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 98 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $400 | $180 |