Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB35F
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Introduced February 2016
- New Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Nikon A900 and Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe A900 was brought out 2 years after the WB35F which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the A900 scores against the WB35F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung WB35F
| A900 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | January 2014 | More modern by 26 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Nikon A900
| WB35F | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung WB35F
| A900 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon A900 has outside dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Samsung WB35F has measurements of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Nikon A900 and Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the A900 and the WB35F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and WB35F is 88 and 93 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking a spec sheet. The picture here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the A900 and WB35F.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Nikon A900 to resolve more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger A900 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB35F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 pounds) | 194g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $400 | $130 |