Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ15W
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 132g - 100 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Announced February 2009
- Also Known as WB550
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ15W, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-S200 (14MP) and the HZ15W (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-S200 was released 18 months later than the HZ15W making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-S200 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung HZ15W being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-S200 grades against the HZ15W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-S200 & Samsung HZ15W. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-S200 Gallery & Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-S200 over the Samsung HZ15W
| EX-S200 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2010 | February 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Casio EX-S200
| HZ15W | EX-S200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-S200 and Samsung HZ15W
| EX-S200 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-S200 features outer measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ15W has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") having a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ15W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-S200 and the HZ15W.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-S200 and HZ15W is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The visual below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-S200 and HZ15W.
All in all, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Casio EX-S200 to result in more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The fresher EX-S200 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-S200 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung HZ15W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-S200 | Samsung HZ15W |
| Also called | - | WB550 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2009-02-23 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) | 249 grams (0.55 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-120 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $330 |