Olympus E-5 vs Panasonic ZS7

Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-5 versus Panasonic ZS7, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-5 (12MP) and the ZS7 (12MP) is pretty close but the E-5 (Four Thirds) and ZS7 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-5 was released 5 months before the ZS7 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS7 being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-5 scores against the ZS7 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-5 Gallery & Panasonic ZS7 Gallery.

For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-5 has physical dimensions of 143mm x 117mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS7 has proportions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-5 versus Panasonic ZS7 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-5 and the ZS7.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-5 and ZS7 is 58 and 91 respectively.

Usually, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The pic here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-5 and ZS7.

All in all, both of those cameras feature the identical resolution albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-5 features the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler.