Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB50F
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- Later Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB50F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Samsung. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and WB50F (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A900 was launched 2 years later than the WB50F and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the A900 matches up versus the WB50F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Samsung WB50F. The complete galleries are available at Nikon A900 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung WB50F
| A900 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | January 2014 | Fresher by 26 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Nikon A900
| WB50F | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung WB50F
| A900 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon A900 features external dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB50F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the A900 compared to the WB50F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and WB50F is 88 and 92 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and WB50F.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You should expect the Nikon A900 to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The younger A900 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB50F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289g (0.64 lb) | 207g (0.46 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $180 |