Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB800F
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Released February 2016
- Replacement is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Photography Glossary Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Nikon A900 and Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies Nikon and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe A900 was revealed 3 years later than the WB800F and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the A900 scores vs the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix A900 and Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung WB800F
| A900 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 39 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Nikon A900
| WB800F | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung WB800F
| A900 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon A900 offers physical dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Nikon A900 and Samsung WB800F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the A900 and the WB800F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A900 and WB800F is 88 and 92 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The visual below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and WB800F.
To sum up, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Nikon A900 to show more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The more recent A900 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2016-02-23 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 pounds) | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $400 | $300 |