Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB850F
88 Imaging
46 Features
58 Overall
50
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-840mm (F3.4-6.9) lens
- 289g - 113 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced February 2016
- New Model is Nikon A1000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Announced January 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Nikon A900 versus Samsung WB850F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Nikon and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the A900 (20MP) and WB850F (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe A900 was manufactured 4 years later than the WB850F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the A900 grades vs the WB850F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix A900 & Samsung WB850F. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon A900 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon A900 over the Samsung WB850F
| A900 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | January 2012 | More recent by 51 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 614k | Clearer screen (+307k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Nikon A900
| WB850F | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Nikon A900 and Samsung WB850F
| A900 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon A900 has outside dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) while the Samsung WB850F has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check the Nikon A900 versus Samsung WB850F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the A900 against the WB850F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A900 and WB850F is 88 and 91 respectively.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by going through specifications. The photograph here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and WB850F.
Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Nikon A900 to show greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger A900 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon A900 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix A900 | Samsung WB850F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2012-01-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-840mm (35.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4-6.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 pounds) | 250 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $599 |
