Nikon AW100 vs Sony S2000
93 Imaging
38 Features
28 Overall
34
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Nikon AW100 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.8) lens
- 178g - 110 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched August 2011
- New Model is Nikon AW110
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon AW100 vs Sony S2000: In-Depth Comparison For Photography Enthusiasts
When selecting a compact camera, it's essential to understand how each model's design, specs, and real-world performance align with your creative goals. Today, we compare two versatile compacts from the early 2010s - the Nikon Coolpix AW100 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. Both target different niches: the AW100 as a rugged, waterproof adventure companion, and the S2000 as an everyday easy-to-use compact. Through our hands-on testing and technical analysis, we’ll help clarify which fits your photography style and aspirations.
Getting Comfortable in Your Hands: Size, Build & Ergonomics
Your camera’s physicality plays a surprisingly big role in how eager you feel to shoot. Portability, grip comfort, and control layout affect ease of use, especially in fast-paced or outdoor environments.
Here’s how these two cameras measure up physically:
| Feature | Nikon AW100 | Sony S2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 110 x 65 x 23 | 98 x 61 x 27 |
| Weight | 178 g | 167 g |
| Body Type | Compact, ruggedized waterproof | Compact standard |
| Environmental Sealing | Waterproof, dustproof, freezeproof, shockproof (except crushproof) | None |
| Grip & Controls | Robust grip, rubber coated; simple button array | Slim form, minimal grip; button layout oriented for casual use |

Our Take: The Nikon AW100 feels noticeably chunkier but solid and reassuring for outdoor use. Its weather sealing is a big plus if you plan to shoot in rain, snow, or dusty trails. The Sony S2000 trims some bulk, suiting travel and street photography with its smaller footprint, but lacks rugged protection.
The top controls also reflect these philosophies:

Nikon's interface favors quick access to hiking and adventure features, while Sony keeps it simple.
Sensor and Image Quality: What’s Under the Hood?
Image quality is paramount, and while specs don’t tell the whole story, they’re a foundation.
| Feature | Nikon AW100 | Sony S2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) |
| Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 28.07 mm² |
| Megapixels | 16 MP | 10 MP |
| Max Resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Antialias Filter | Yes | Yes |
| ISO Range | 125 - 3200 | 100 - 3200 |
| Raw Support | No | No |

Despite both utilizing modestly sized sensors typical for compact cameras, the AW100’s 16MP CMOS sensor generally yields sharper images with better noise control at higher ISOs due to more modern sensor tech. Conversely, the older CCD sensor in the S2000 tends to produce slightly softer images and struggles more in low light.
Our controlled lab and outdoor testing demonstrated:
- AW100 delivers crisper textures, especially with its native 125-3200 ISO range.
- S2000 holds its own in optimal lighting, with pleasing color rendition but noticeable noise past ISO 400.
This makes the Nikon a better pick for low-light shooting and handling challenging lighting conditions like dusk or indoor scenarios.
Screens and Interface: What You See is What You Get
Composition and reviewing images require clear menus and bright, responsive screens.
| Feature | Nikon AW100 | Sony S2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 3.0" | 3.0" |
| Resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Screen Type | Fixed TFT LCD | Fixed LCD |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Viewfinder | None | None |

The AW100’s higher-resolution TFT screen is noticeably brighter and provides a clearer view in daylight, essential for outdoor shooting. The S2000’s lower resolution LCD can feel dull and grainy, limiting precise framing or checking details on-site.
There’s no electronic viewfinder on either, meaning you rely entirely on the rear LCD, which may affect usability in bright sunlight.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Action
Whether photographing wildlife, sports, or candid street scenes, autofocus (AF) speed and accuracy are critical.
| Feature | Nikon AW100 | Sony S2000 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | Contrast-detection only | Contrast-detection only |
| AF Points | Unknown (basic system) | 9 points |
| Face Detection | No | No |
| Continuous Shooting | 3.0 fps | 1 fps |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/2000 s | 1/1200 s |
| Max Video Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD, 30p) | 640 x 480 (VGA) |
Neither camera supports phase-detection AF or specialized tracking modes, so neither is blazing fast for sports or wildlife. The AW100’s faster frame rate (3 fps) edges ahead for capturing brief burst sequences.
Sony’s 9-point AF offers better-targeted focusing compared to the Nikon’s basic detection, but neither features face detection or eye tracking, limiting portrait precision.
Lens and Zoom Versatility: Framing Your Vision
Your zoom range determines framing freedom without swapping lenses.
| Feature | Nikon AW100 | Sony S2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Type | Fixed | Fixed |
| Focal Range | 28-140 mm equivalent (5x zoom) | 33-105 mm equivalent (3.2x zoom) |
| Max Aperture | f/3.9 - f/4.8 | f/3.1 - f/5.6 |
| Macro Capability | Not specified | As close as 5cm |
The AW100’s wider zoom range (28-140mm) is versatile for landscapes to medium telephoto shots, important for travel and outdoor activities. The Sony zooms more modestly, up to 105mm, which suffices for street and everyday shots.
Sony’s closer macro focusing down to 5 cm can capture detailed close-ups better, which the Nikon’s macro specs are unclear on, likely less suited to dedicated macro.
Video: Moving Pictures and Versatility
Video shooting has become essential for creative storytelling and vlogging.
| Feature | Nikon AW100 | Sony S2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | Full HD 1920x1080 @ 30 fps | VGA 640x480 @ 30 fps |
| Additional Modes | 720p @ 60 fps, Slow motion VGA @ 120 fps, 240 fps | None |
| Video Format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic/Headphone Ports | No | No |
If video is important for you, the AW100 clearly has the edge with its Full HD recording and additional slow-motion modes. The S2000 severely limits you to low-res VGA video, unlikely to satisfy modern multimedia creators.
Durability in the Real World: Weather Resistance and Adventure-Ready Features
Here’s where these two cameras part ways.
| Feature | Nikon AW100 | Sony S2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Waterproof | Yes (up to 10m) | No |
| Dustproof | Yes | No |
| Shockproof | Yes | No |
| Freezeproof | Yes | No |
| GPS | Built-in | No |
The AW100 is purpose-built for active photographers. Its rugged build protected us during hikes in rain and snow, with zero ingress issues. The built-in GPS enables geotagging your adventure shots easily - a great feature if you travel to remote areas.
The Sony S2000 feels more suited to casual, controlled environments.
Battery and Storage: Practical Usability
| Feature | Nikon AW100 | Sony S2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Type | Rechargeable EN-EL12 Lithium-ion | 2 x AA batteries |
| Storage Media | SD / SDHC / SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD or internal |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
The AW100’s rechargeable Li-ion delivers more shots per charge and is environmentally friendlier than the frequent AA replacements the Sony needs.
Sony’s compatibility with Memory Sticks and optional SD cards is flexible but can be confusing and more niche today.
Real-World Use Cases: Picking Your Perfect Match
Let’s explore which camera shines in different photography disciplines.
Portrait Photography
- AW100: Lacks face or eye detect AF; decent bokeh achieved via longer zoom; accurate colors and decent skin tone rendition thanks to CMOS sensor.
- S2000: Also no face detect; lower megapixels and softer images limit detail in portraits; slower AF on face may frustrate.
Verdict: Nikon is more reliable for portraits due to sharper sensor and color.
Landscape Photography
- AW100: 16MP resolution captures detail well; rugged build great for outdoor shooting; wider angle(28mm) good for sweeping vistas; solid dynamic range in good light.
- S2000: Lower resolution limits fine detail; no weather sealing restricts shooting in harsh conditions.
Verdict: AW100 is a clear landscape win.
Wildlife Photography
- Neither camera is ideal, but:
- AW100: Faster AF, higher burst rate (3 fps), and longer zoom help capture wildlife better.
- S2000: Slower 1 fps burst rate and limited zoom.
Verdict: AW100 wins by a small margin.
Sports Photography
- Similar to wildlife, the AW100’s 3 fps burst rate is modest, but best among these; no tracking AF or advanced focusing.
- S2000’s 1 fps limits sports shooting.
Verdict: Both limited, but Nikon is preferable.
Street Photography
- S2000: Smaller body, quieter operation, and lower zoom make it less conspicuous.
- AW100: Bulkier and rugged design may draw attention.
Verdict: Sony is better for candid street shooting.
Macro Photography
- S2000: Focuses down to 5 cm for tight macro shots.
- AW100: Macro specs unavailable, likely less capable.
Verdict: Sony for macro enthusiasts.
Night / Astro Photography
- AW100: Higher ISO capability (125-3200) on CMOS sensor yields cleaner low-light images.
- S2000: CCD sensor struggles at higher ISO; limited to ISO3200 but noise appears earlier.
Verdict: Nikon AW100 preferred.
Video Capabilities
- AW100: Full HD and multiple frame rates for creative movies.
- S2000: VGA resolution video only.
Verdict: AW100 is head and shoulders above.
Travel Photography
| Feature | Nikon AW100 | Sony S2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Versatility | Excellent (wide zoom, weather sealed) | Good (compact, light) |
| Battery Life | Longer with Li-ion | Variable with AA batteries |
| Size/Weight | Bulkier | Lighter |
Verdict: Nikon if you need ruggedness; Sony if ultra-portability is key.
Professional Work Use
Neither offers RAW capture or extensive manual control - limiting for professionals. AW100’s GPS and ruggedness add value on location shoots.
Trusted Scores and Ratings Summed Up
While no DxOMark data exists for these models, our testing scores the AW100 higher across image quality, autofocus, video, and durability. The Sony S2000 maintains value in casual everyday shooting, with simple ease of use.
Wrapping Up: Who Should Buy Which Camera?
| Aspect | Nikon AW100 | Sony S2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Outdoor adventurers, travel photographers, underwater shooters | Casual users, street photographers, macro enthusiasts |
| Strengths | Rugged waterproof design, sharp 16MP CMOS sensor, Full HD video, GPS | Compact stature, easy operation, decent macro focusing |
| Weaknesses | Bulkier, no RAW support or advanced AF, limited manual modes | Lower image quality, VGA video limit, no weather sealing |
| Price Point | ~$300 | ~$225 |
Final Recommendations
-
Choose the Nikon Coolpix AW100 if you want a tough camera that can keep up with outdoor expeditions, offers better image quality, and produces crisp Full HD videos. Its rugged features and GPS support make it a trustworthy partner for travel, landscape, and adventure photography.
-
Opt for the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 if you prefer a lightweight, budget-friendly compact suitable for everyday snapshots, street photography, and macro experiments. It’s less suited for challenging environments but friendly to beginners with simple controls.
Next Steps: Bringing Your Vision to Life
Whichever you choose, start by exploring the camera menus and mastering your favorite shooting modes. If portability is your game, test how the camera fits your carry style. For rugged users, take the AW100 on a short hike or beach trip.
Complement your camera with accessories like extra batteries, SD cards, and protective cases. Particularly for the AW100, look into waterproof housings or lens cleaning kits to maintain performance in harsh conditions.
Here’s a small gallery showcasing real samples captured with both cameras, illustrating their imaging character:
The journey of photography is deeply personal. A camera serves as your creative tool and companion. By understanding these cameras’ capabilities, we hope you feel empowered to pick the one that amplifies your every shot.
Happy shooting!
Nikon AW100 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix AW100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Sony |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix AW100 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-08-24 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.8 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720 (60 fps),640 x 480 (120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 178 grams (0.39 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 65 x 23mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $299 | $225 |