Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 III

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front
Portability
80
Imaging
62
Features
88
Overall
72

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 III Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Introduced October 2019
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
  • Newer Model is OM System OM-5
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 III Overview

Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-M5 III, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and E-M5 III (20MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-400 was unveiled 14 years before the E-M5 III and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-400 matches up versus the E-M5 III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus E-M5 III

 E-400 E-M5 III 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus E-400

 E-M5 III E-400 
IntroducedOctober 2019September 2006Fresher by 159 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimension3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1040k215kSharper screen (+825k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-M5 III

 E-400 E-M5 III 
Manual focus Dial precise focus

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 III Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 provides outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M5 III has proportions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-M5 III in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-400 compared to the E-M5 III.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 III size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and E-M5 III is 77 and 80 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 III Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing specifications. The visual below might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and E-M5 III.

To sum up, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Olympus E-M5 III to show greater detail having an extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-400 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-M5 III Portrait photography highlights
46
you can focus manually
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
no manual exposure
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
77
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
saves RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography details
Olympus E-M5 III Street photography details
60
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
83
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
supports touch to focus
environment proofing
above average high ISO (25,600)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography advice
Olympus E-M5 III Sports photography advice
38
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
76
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
high max frames per second (30.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proofing
supports phase detect auto focus
not so great battery (310 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography info
Olympus E-M5 III Travel photography info
49
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse function
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
77
environment proofing
supports bluetooth
supports touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery (310 CIPA)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-M5 III as a Landscape photography camera
45
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is small (2.5 inches)
doesn't have liveview
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10MP)
does not have Timelapse function
77
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
not so great battery (310 shots)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-M5 III Vlogging advice
9
can't shoot video
84
screen is selfie friendly
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with external mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus E-M5 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus E-M5 III
 Olympus E-400Olympus OM-D E-M5 III
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-400 Olympus OM-D E-M5 III
Class Entry-Level DSLR Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2006-09-14 2019-10-17
Physical type Compact SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CCD MOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW photos
Minimum boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 121
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 45 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 215k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.68x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/8000s
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames per sec 30.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution None 4096x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435g (0.96 pounds) 414g (0.91 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 310 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLN-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported)
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $599 $1,199