Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2
92 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
![Nikon Coolpix AW120 front Nikon Coolpix AW120 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-AW120/Nikon-AW120-front.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-SH-2/Olympus-SH-2-front.jpg)
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 213g - 110 x 66 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Earlier Model is Nikon AW110
- Replacement is Nikon AW130
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-1
- Replacement is Olympus SH-3
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Nikon AW120 versus Olympus SH-2, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the AW120 (16MP) and the SH-2 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The AW120 was unveiled 13 months before the SH-2 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the AW120 grades vs the SH-2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix AW120 and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The full galleries are available at Nikon AW120 Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon AW120 over the Olympus SH-2
AW120 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Nikon AW120
SH-2 | AW120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2015 | ![]() | February 2014 | More recent by 13 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon AW120 and Olympus SH-2
AW120 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon AW120 provides outer dimensions of 110mm x 66mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Olympus SH-2 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Examine the Nikon AW120 versus Olympus SH-2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the AW120 and the SH-2.
![Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-AW120-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-2-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the AW120 and SH-2 is 92 and 88 respectively.
![Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-AW120-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-2-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The photograph here might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the AW120 and SH-2.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution so you should expect similar quality of images although you have to take the production date of the products into consideration. The older AW120 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
![Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-AW120-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-2-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-AW120-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-2-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix AW120 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix AW120 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2014-02-07 | 2015-03-11 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 921k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 213 grams (0.47 lb) | 271 grams (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 66 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 380 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-92B |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $350 | $399 |