Nikon AW120 vs Olympus VR-340
92 Imaging
39 Features
45 Overall
41
96 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 213g - 110 x 66 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Replaced the Nikon AW110
- Newer Model is Nikon AW130
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon AW120 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Nikon AW120 and Olympus VR-340, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the AW120 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe AW120 was revealed 2 years after the VR-340 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the AW120 scores versus the VR-340 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon AW120 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix AW120 & Olympus VR-340. The full galleries are provided at Nikon AW120 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon AW120 over the Olympus VR-340
| AW120 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | January 2012 | Newer by 26 months | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Nikon AW120
| VR-340 | AW120 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon AW120 and Olympus VR-340
| AW120 | VR-340 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Nikon AW120 has outside dimensions of 110mm x 66mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Nikon AW120 and Olympus VR-340 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the AW120 vs the VR-340.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the AW120 and VR-340 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The pic below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the AW120 and VR-340.
To sum up, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution and you can expect similar quality of photographs although you would want to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer AW120 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix AW120 | Olympus VR-340 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix AW120 | Olympus VR-340 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2014-02-07 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/3.0-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | OLED monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 213 grams (0.47 lbs) | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 66 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $350 | $130 |