Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
92 Imaging
40 Features
45 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/673ca/673ca02d18d67ebb14affcf3cd9502c5c8ebf317" alt="Nikon Coolpix AW120 front Nikon Coolpix AW120 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 213g - 110 x 66 x 26mm
- Launched February 2014
- Older Model is Nikon AW110
- Renewed by Nikon AW130
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's look closer at the Nikon AW120 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the AW120 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the AW120 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") have totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The AW120 was revealed 14 months after the XZ-2 iHS which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the AW120 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix AW120 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon AW120 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon AW120 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
AW120 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | December 2012 | More modern by 14 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon AW120
XZ-2 iHS | AW120 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon AW120 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
AW120 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon AW120 provides outside measurements of 110mm x 66mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon AW120 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the AW120 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14b1e/14b1e0a54fb019e0df6442c354ba6c0790c30709" alt="Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the AW120 and XZ-2 iHS is 92 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3af62/3af6288db232885da678b198401296b7e0dda2e4" alt="Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The pic underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the AW120 and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The AW120 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Nikon AW120 will give extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher AW120 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2e04/b2e04f3346b56b77ce0d60ec29add11e20ee90aa" alt="Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63ff9/63ff9ced054ae1518e7790b7c56e955d8044d35f" alt="Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Nikon AW120 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix AW120 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix AW120 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-02-07 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 213g (0.47 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 66 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | 340 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-90B |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $350 | $450 |