Nikon AW130 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Nikon AW130 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 221g - 110 x 66 x 27mm
- Launched February 2015
- Earlier Model is Nikon AW120
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon AW130 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here, we are comparing the Nikon AW130 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the AW130 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the AW130 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe AW130 was released 2 years later than the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the AW130 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Nikon AW130 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix AW130 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon AW130 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon AW130 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| AW130 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 | December 2012 | More recent by 27 months | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon AW130
| XZ-2 iHS | AW130 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon AW130 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| AW130 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Nikon AW130 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Nikon AW130 enjoys outer dimensions of 110mm x 66mm x 27mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon AW130 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the AW130 against the XZ-2 iHS.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the AW130 and XZ-2 iHS is 91 and 85 respectively.
Nikon AW130 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The photograph here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the AW130 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The AW130 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field harder and the Nikon AW130 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer AW130 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Nikon AW130 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon AW130 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix AW130 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix AW130 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2015-02-10 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i ,50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 66 x 27mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 370 images | 340 images |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $398 | $450 |