Nikon B700 vs Olympus VR-320
65 Imaging
46 Features
64 Overall
53


94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Nikon B700 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-1440mm (F3.3-6.5) lens
- 565g - 125 x 85 x 107mm
- Launched February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330

Nikon B700 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Nikon B700 versus Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the B700 (20MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The B700 was announced 4 years later than the VR-320 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Nikon B700 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the B700 grades against the VR-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Nikon B700 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix B700 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon B700 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon B700 over the Olympus VR-320
B700 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 56 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon B700
VR-320 | B700 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon B700 and Olympus VR-320
B700 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Nikon B700 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon B700 offers exterior measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 107mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.2") accompanied by a weight of 565 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Nikon B700 versus Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the B700 versus the VR-320.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the B700 and VR-320 is 65 and 94 respectively.

Nikon B700 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specifications. The photograph here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the B700 and VR-320.
Plainly, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Nikon B700 to deliver greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The newer B700 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Nikon B700 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon B700 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix B700 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix B700 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2016-02-23 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1440mm (60.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 921k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 565 grams (1.25 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 107mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL23 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $500 | $179 |