Nikon L100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
79 Imaging
32 Features
28 Overall
30
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Nikon L100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 360g - 110 x 72 x 78mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Replacement is Nikon L110
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon L100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Nikon L100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the L100 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is very similar but the L100 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe L100 was unveiled 4 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the L100 scores versus the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Nikon L100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix L100 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon L100 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L100 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| L100 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon L100
| XZ-2 iHS | L100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | December 2012 | February 2009 | More modern by 47 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Nikon L100 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| L100 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Nikon L100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon L100 enjoys outside measurements of 110mm x 72mm x 78mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 360 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Nikon L100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the L100 against the XZ-2 iHS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the L100 and XZ-2 iHS is 79 and 85 respectively.
Nikon L100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing technical specs. The image here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the L100 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The L100 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will offer extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged L100 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon L100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon L100 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix L100 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix L100 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-02-03 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 360g (0.79 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 72 x 78mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 3.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $450 |