Nikon L100 vs Samsung WB2200F
79 Imaging
32 Features
28 Overall
30
59 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Nikon L100 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 360g - 110 x 72 x 78mm
- Announced February 2009
- Updated by Nikon L110
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Released January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon L100 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Nikon L100 vs Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Nikon and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the L100 (10MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe L100 was announced 5 years before the WB2200F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Nikon L100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the L100 matches up against the WB2200F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon L100 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix L100 & Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are available at Nikon L100 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L100 over the Samsung WB2200F
| L100 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Nikon L100
| WB2200F | L100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 59 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon L100 and Samsung WB2200F
| L100 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Nikon L100 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Nikon L100 has outside measurements of 110mm x 72mm x 78mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 3.1") having a weight of 360 grams (0.79 lbs) while the Samsung WB2200F has measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") having a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Check the Nikon L100 vs Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the L100 and the WB2200F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the L100 and WB2200F is 79 and 59 respectively.
Nikon L100 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The pic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the L100 and WB2200F.
All in all, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Samsung WB2200F to give you more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged L100 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon L100 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon L100 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix L100 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix L100 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-02-03 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-420mm (15.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.4 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 1/8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow, Off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 360 grams (0.79 lb) | 708 grams (1.56 lb) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 72 x 78mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 3.1") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $399 | $599 |