Clicky

Nikon L110 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
77
Imaging
35
Features
28
Overall
32
Nikon Coolpix L110 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Nikon L110 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Nikon L110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
  • 406g - 109 x 74 x 78mm
  • Introduced February 2010
  • Older Model is Nikon L100
  • Renewed by Nikon L120
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus VR-320
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Nikon L110 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Lets look closer at the Nikon L110 and Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the L110 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The L110 was launched 12 months prior to the VR-330 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summation of how the L110 grades versus the VR-330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon L110 over the Olympus VR-330

 L110 VR-330 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Nikon L110

 VR-330 L110 
RevealedFebruary 2011February 2010Newer by 12 months

Common features in the Nikon L110 and Olympus VR-330

 L110 VR-330 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Screen resolution460k460kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Nikon L110 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Nikon L110 features outer dimensions of 109mm x 74mm x 78mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.1") and a weight of 406 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check out the Nikon L110 and Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the L110 versus the VR-330.

Nikon L110 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the L110 and VR-330 is 77 and 94 respectively.

Nikon L110 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Nikon L110 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The pic here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the L110 and VR-330.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus VR-330 to resolve more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged L110 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Nikon L110 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Nikon L110 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon L110 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon L110 Portrait photography information
Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography information
21
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
33
decent MP (14MP)
comes with face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Nikon L110 Street photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Street photography advice
49
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158g)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Nikon L110 Sports photography highlights
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography highlights
34
amazing zoom range (28-420mm 15.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low resolution (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14MP)
comes with tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Nikon L110 Travel photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography advice
54
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
great reach (420mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
low resolution (12 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
70
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Nikon L110 Landscape photography features
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography features
35
quite wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not available
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
42
pretty wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon L110 Vlogging info
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging info
25
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic jack
32
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Nikon L110 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon L110 and Olympus VR-330
 Nikon Coolpix L110Olympus VR-330
General Information
Manufacturer Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix L110 Olympus VR-330
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2010-02-03 2011-02-08
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Expeed C2 TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Max enhanced ISO 6400 -
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-420mm (15.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture f/3.5-5.4 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 13.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 406 grams (0.90 lb) 158 grams (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 109 x 74 x 78mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.1") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 4 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (3 sec or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Launch cost $280 $220