Nikon L20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Nikon L20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-136mm (F3.1-6.7) lens
- 135g - 97 x 61 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Nikon L20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below is a extended review of the Nikon L20 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the L20 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched but the L20 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") have totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe L20 was unveiled 4 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the L20 grades versus the XZ-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon L20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix L20 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are available at Nikon L20 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L20 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
L20 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Nikon L20
XZ-2 iHS | L20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2012 | February 2009 | More recent by 47 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon L20 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
L20 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Nikon L20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Nikon L20 comes with external dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 29mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the Nikon L20 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the L20 against the XZ-2 iHS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the L20 and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
Nikon L20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at specifications. The graphic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the L20 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The L20 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will resolve extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older L20 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Nikon L20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon L20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix L20 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix L20 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-02-03 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 38-136mm (3.6x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-6.7 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 135g (0.30 lbs) | 346g (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 61 x 29mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 2 x AA | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $120 | $450 |