Nikon L20 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Nikon L20 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-136mm (F3.1-6.7) lens
- 135g - 97 x 61 x 29mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon L20 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Nikon L20 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the L20 (10MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe L20 was launched 6 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the L20 grades versus the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon L20 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix L20 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon L20 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L20 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| L20 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Nikon L20
| WG-4 GPS | L20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | February 2009 | More recent by 60 months | |
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon L20 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| L20 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Nikon L20 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon L20 offers physical measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 29mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Nikon L20 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the L20 vs the WG-4 GPS.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the L20 and WG-4 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Nikon L20 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements only by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the L20 and WG-4 GPS.
Clearly, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs more aggressively. The older L20 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Nikon L20 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon L20 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix L20 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix L20 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-02-03 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-136mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-6.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow, Off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 135g (0.30 lbs) | 235g (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 61 x 29mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $120 | $210 |