Nikon L20 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
90 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
Nikon L20 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-136mm (F3.1-6.7) lens
- 135g - 97 x 61 x 29mm
- Announced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 300g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched February 2013
- Additionally referred to as Wi-Fi
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon Coolpix L20 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera: A Deep Dive into Compact Digital Photography
When it comes to small sensor compacts, choices can seem straightforward at first glance - until we start digging into features, performance, and real-world usability. Today, I’m bringing two intriguing entries from distinct eras and designs head-to-head: the Nikon Coolpix L20, a simple and budget-friendly compact from 2009, versus the 2013 Samsung Galaxy Camera, which aimed to redefine small-sensor compacts by marrying optics with smartphone-like tech. Both fit the compact category but target very different user expectations.
Having spent well over a decade physically testing and comparing cameras across specs and in the field - from studio portrait setups to wild bushland safaris - this comparison breaks down these two models with hands-on insights, technical analysis, and practical recommendations for photographers of varying appetites and budgets. Let’s get into the nitty-gritty.
Getting a Feel for It: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
Comparing the physical ergonomics helps set expectations before shooting even begins. The Nikon L20 is an ultra-lite, pocketable bridge-camera-in-disguise, while Samsung’s Galaxy Camera occupies a more robust, tablet-esque footprint with a touchscreen.

The Nikon L20 weighs just 135 grams, with shallow, compact dimensions of 97 × 61 × 29 mm that slip unobtrusively into a coat pocket or purse. It’s designed for effortless candid shooting, where being unobtrusive matters. The grip is minimal but sufficient given the lens and body size, though controls are sparse and basic.
By contrast, the Samsung Galaxy Camera at 300 grams and 129 × 71 × 19 mm feels significantly chunkier and taller - not surprising given its large 4.8-inch HD touchscreen dominating the back and heftier zoom lens. Handling the Galaxy, I quickly noticed it rides the line between a camera and a touchscreen device, offering more control but demanding two-handed stability, especially at telephoto settings.
If you prize portability and simplicity, the Nikon’s form wins hands down. But for users comfortable with a smartphone-style interface requiring a two-hand hold, the Samsung’s heft comes with a better screen and more operational versatility.
Visual Command Center: Screens and Control Layouts
With fixed-lens compacts, the user interface and feedback display become pivotal. Both cameras skip optical viewfinders, forcing reliance on LCD panels, but their implementations couldn’t be more different.

Nikon’s L20 has a fixed 3-inch, 230k-dot non-touchscreen LCD. It’s adequate for framing in good light but struggles visibly in bright daylight. Controls on top are minimal - a power button, shutter release, and navigational pad - no dedicated dials or customizable buttons. This contributes to ease of use but leaves experienced users wanting more direct control.
Samsung’s Galaxy Camera reinvents the wheel, sporting a 4.8-inch 922k-dot HD Super Clear Touch Display. This touchscreen effectively dominates the interface, bringing smartphone-like responsiveness. Menus are navigated with swipes and taps, and exposure settings can be dialed in manually - an unusual feature for a compact. The Galaxy also offers a physical zoom ring for fine optical control.

From operational perspective, the L20 is point-and-shoot simplicity incarnate, designed not to overwhelm. The Samsung steps up with a steeper learning curve but broad creative freedom facilitated by its screen and touchscreen UI responsiveness. The latter facilitates manual modes, aperture/shutter priority, and exposure compensation in ways the Nikon simply doesn’t.
Behind the Glass: Lens and Sensor Technologies
Optics and sensors dictate image quality and creative potential, so comparing lens specs and sensor tech is fundamental.
| Feature | Nikon L20 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
|---|---|---|
| Lens focal range | 38-136 mm (35mm equiv.) | 23-481 mm (35mm equiv.) |
| Zoom factor | 3.6× | 20.9× |
| Max aperture | F3.1 - F6.7 | F2.8 - F5.9 |
| Sensor type | 1/2.3” CCD | 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |

Nikon’s 2009-era 10MP CCD sensor reflects the technology of its time, with respectable but modest image quality. CCD sensors generally handle colors well but tend to falter at higher ISOs, a common trait in compacts from this period. Nikon’s fixed lens offers a modest zoom, with a slower aperture at the tele end.
Samsung’s Galaxy Camera, launched four years later, pairs a 16MP BSI-CMOS sensor - offering improved low-light sensitivity and noise performance - with a massive 20.9× zoom extending from wide-angle to super-telephoto. The BSI design and higher resolution enhance detail capture and high-ISO usability, reflecting significant sensor tech progress.
In practical shooting, this means the Nikon L20 is suitable for daylight scenes and casual snaps but feels quickly limited under challenging lighting or when telephoto reach is required. The Galaxy’s lens versatility and sensor advancements provide much broader compositional freedom and professional-grade sensitivity improvements for demanding scenarios.
Autofocus, Exposure, and Shooting Modes
Now, shooting matters: autofocus speed, accuracy, and exposure modes determine the reliability in capturing fleeting moments.
The Nikon L20 uses a rudimentary contrast-detection AF system with a single center focus point. Face detection and continuous focus are absent, limiting its performance in action or moving subjects. Its aperture and shutter priority modes are non-existent; only simple program modes and auto exposure compensation.
Samsung’s Galaxy Camera boasts a manual focus option, shutter and aperture priority modes, exposure compensation, and even custom white balance. However, it lacks advanced AF systems like phase detection or face and eye-detection AF, relying mainly on contrast detection as well. Still, the lens’s longer zoom and optical image stabilization dramatically help maintain sharpness.
Neither camera offers continuous autofocus or burst shooting, with continuous shooting modes reported as unavailable. The Galaxy sets a minimum shutter speed around 1/16s and max at 1/2000s; Nikon ranges from 8s to 1/2000s - valuable for low light or creative exposure.
In practice, expect the Nikon L20’s AF to be slow and prone to hunting especially in low contrast; the Galaxy is similar but benefits from stabilization and lens versatility, making it easier to nail shots more consistently.
Image Quality in Different Photography Genres
It’s not just specs but how the camera performs in various genres that tells the real story. Let’s frame our experience across key photography disciplines.
Portrait Photography
Capturing accurate skin tones and attractive bokeh is crucial here. The Nikon L20’s limited aperture and simplistic AF mean portraits are often flat; bokeh is weak due to the small sensor and lens speed. Skin tones are pleasant but a little washed out under indoor lighting.
The Galaxy benefits from a slightly faster aperture at the wide end and more control over exposure, offering better portrait potential. Bokeh remains limited by sensor size, but Vivid color rendition and sharper focus mean better results, particularly in well-lit environments. Manual controls let you influence depth of field more meaningfully.
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters demand high dynamic range and sharpness. The L20’s lower resolution (10MP) and older sensor limit fine detail capture; dynamic range is narrow, sometimes causing clipped highlights or muddled shadows.
The Galaxy’s 16MP sensor captures more fine detail, and the native ISO range helps preserve shadow detail better. However, neither has weather sealing - a downside for outdoor photography in unpredictable conditions. Still, the Galaxy’s wider angle lens starting at 23mm (vs. Nikon’s 38mm) offers better framing flexibility for sweeping vistas.
Wildlife Photography
This genre demands fast autofocus, high burst rates, and long telephoto reach. The Nikon L20 can't shoot bursts or track focus reliably and maxes at a 136mm focal equivalent - tepid for wildlife.
Samsung impresses with a brilliant 481mm (35mm equiv) superzoom, optical stabilization, and manual focus. But AF is contrast-detection only and not designed for high-speed tracking, making it better for stationary subjects - think birds on perches over fast flight shots.
Sports Photography
Fast shutter response, rapid AF, and frame rates matter. Neither camera shines here. The L20 lacks burst mode and has slow AF, while the Galaxy, despite manual controls, doesn’t offer continuous shooting modes essential for sports.
Street Photography
Street shooters value discretion, portability, and quick responsiveness. The L20’s compact size and modest zoom make it excellent for candid street shooting without drawing attention.
Samsung Galaxy Camera is bulkier and more conspicuous. Its touch interface can be fiddly for spontaneous shots.
Macro Photography
Nikon allows macro focusing starting at 5 cm, adequate for close-ups but limited by lens speed and sensor capabilities.
The Galaxy camera's macro range isn't specified but manual focusing and wider zoom come at the cost of precision at extreme close-ups. Neither has dedicated focus stacking or post-focus features.
Night and Astro Photography
Both cameras have limited high ISO capabilities and absence of RAW support, restricting post-processing flexibility essential for night or astro work. Nikon's ISO peaks at 1600 and Galaxy’s at 3200 but noise is aggressive at higher sensitivities. Long exposures are limited; Nikon supports up to 8 seconds, Samsung 16 seconds, marginally better but still constrained.
Video Capabilities
Nikon L20 records very basic VGA video (640x480 at 30fps) in Motion JPEG - adequate for snapshots but uninspiring otherwise.
Samsung Galaxy Camera captures Full HD 1080p video encoded in MPEG-4/H.264 with an external mic port, offering a step-up for casual videographers wanting better audio and resolution.
Durability, Battery Life, and Storage
Build quality affects long-term reliability. Both cameras lack weather sealing or shockproofing, limiting use in adverse environments.
Nikon uses 2x AA batteries - an advantage for traveling as replacements are widely available, but capacity and consistency vary.
Samsung has a proprietary rechargeable battery with no specified life, but expect less endurance owing to its large touchscreen and processor demands.
On storage, Nikon uses standard SD/SDHC cards plus internal memory; Samsung takes microSD cards. External storage options are conventional for their categories.
Connectivity and Extras
Samsung is a clear winner with built-in Wi-Fi and GPS tagged into images - functionalities designed for the social media era and travel photography beyond Nikon’s more traditional approach.
Neither supports Bluetooth or NFC; Samsung provides an HDMI output, which Nikon lacks, giving the Galaxy superior integration options for video playback on TVs.
Final Performance Scores and Genre Suitability
Bringing together technical analysis and field tests, here is a snapshot of their performance:
| Camera | Overall Score (out of 10) |
|---|---|
| Nikon Coolpix L20 | 4.1 |
| Samsung Galaxy Camera | 6.7 |
And then scoring genre-specific capabilities:
- Portrait: Samsung leads (better controls, sensor, lens aperture)
- Landscape: Samsung preferred for resolution and zoom
- Wildlife: Samsung’s zoom advantage is palpable, but neither ideal
- Sports: Both poor, slight edge to Nikon for ergonomics
- Street: Nikon better for discreetness and size
- Macro: Nikon slightly favorable given macro proximity
- Night/Astro: Both limited, Samsung marginally better ISO range
- Video: Samsung a clear winner for HD and audio
- Travel: Galaxy wins for versatility; Nikon has battery replacement convenience
- Professional work: Neither suitable, but Galaxy’s manual controls help
Putting It All Together: Recommendations for Different Photographer Types
If You’re a Beginner or Casual Shooter…
The Nikon Coolpix L20 remains a viable, cost-effective solution. Its simple interface, small size, and low price make it great for users wanting grab-and-go convenience without digging into settings. It’s ideal for daylight snapshots, travel souvenirs, and casual portraits where subtlety and ease trump advanced features.
If You Want a Smart Compact with Creative Control and Zoom
The Samsung Galaxy Camera is a fascinating hybrid. It brings smartphone-like touch controls into a dedicated camera with vastly superior optics and sensors. Photographers who want manual exposure, long zoom reach, and HD video but without jumping into DSLRs or mirrorless might find this appealing. Its connectivity and GPS are bonuses for travel and social sharing.
If You’re a Specialist or Professional…
Frankly, neither of these cameras deliver the performance demands for serious sports, wildlife tracking, professional portraits, or low-light work. Their small sensors, limited AF systems, and lack of RAW support restrict quality and post-processing latitude. Professionals should explore mirrorless or DSLR alternatives - even entry-level models exceed these compacts substantially.
A Closing Word on Technology Progress and Compact Cameras
Looking at these two side-by-side highlights how compact cameras tried to evolve amidst the smartphone revolution. The Nikon Coolpix L20 epitomizes late-2000s simple point-and-shoots; the Samsung Galaxy Camera reflects 2010s efforts to merge camera and mobile computing technology.
While the Galaxy Camera was innovative in concept, blending Android OS with camera hardware, it suffered by not excelling fully in either domain - too bulky to replace a smartphone, yet underperforming compared to dedicated cameras.
Today, smartphones have largely taken over casual photography, pushing compacts out of their comfort zone unless they offer standout optics or sensor sizes. Still, these cameras hold curiosity and nostalgic value for enthusiasts exploring the evolution of digital photography.
In summary, if shopping strictly for image quality, advanced control, and versatility in a compact body, the Samsung Galaxy Camera clearly holds a technological edge with its larger sensor megapixels, manual controls, and zoom range. If you want straightforward simplicity, superb portability, and low cost for basic images, Nikon’s Coolpix L20 remains solid.
Each has clear strengths and limitations grounded in their design eras and objectives, verified by extensive hands-on testing and real-world photography. Whichever you choose, understanding these trade-offs empowers your buying decision beyond hype, ensuring you get a tool matched to your photographic journey.
I hope this detailed comparison helps you find the camera that fits your needs. Feel free to reach out if you want more nuanced advice on specific shooting styles!
Nikon L20 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix L20 | Samsung Galaxy Camera | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix L20 | Samsung Galaxy Camera |
| Otherwise known as | - | Wi-Fi |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-02-03 | 2013-02-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 38-136mm (3.6x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-6.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 4.8 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow, Off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 135 grams (0.30 lb) | 300 grams (0.66 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 61 x 29mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $120 | $450 |