Clicky

Olympus 8000 vs Sony RX10 IV

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV front
Portability
52
Imaging
53
Features
82
Overall
64

Olympus 8000 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs

Olympus 8000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • Additionally Known as mju Tough 8000
Sony RX10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Introduced September 2017
  • Previous Model is Sony RX10 III
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus 8000 vs Sony RX10 IV Overview

Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus 8000 versus Sony RX10 IV, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and RX10 IV (20MP) and the 8000 (1/2.3") and RX10 IV (1") offer totally different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The 8000 was manufactured 9 years earlier than the RX10 IV which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the 8000 grades vs the RX10 IV in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sony RX10 IV

 8000 RX10 IV 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Olympus 8000

 RX10 IV 8000 
IntroducedSeptember 2017July 2009Newer by 99 months
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1440k230kClearer screen (+1210k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sony RX10 IV

 8000 RX10 IV 
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus 8000 vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8000 enjoys outer dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Sony RX10 IV has measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus 8000 versus Sony RX10 IV in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the 8000 against the RX10 IV.

Olympus 8000 vs Sony RX10 IV size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and RX10 IV is 94 and 52 respectively.

Olympus 8000 vs Sony RX10 IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The image underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and RX10 IV.

All in all, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The 8000 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony RX10 IV will provide greater detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus 8000 vs Sony RX10 IV sensor size comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 8000 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 8000 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony RX10 IV as a Portrait photography camera
21
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
71
you can focus manually
high flash sync speed (1/2,000 seconds)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
includes face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus 8000 Street photography info
Sony RX10 IV Street photography info
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
64
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
supports RAW formats
includes touch to focus
weather sealing
heavier than average in class (1,095g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus 8000 as a Sports photography camera
Sony RX10 IV as a Sports photography camera
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
76
incredible zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (24.0 frames per second)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
includes tracking autofocus
weather sealing
has phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus 8000 as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX10 IV as a Travel photography camera
61
environment proof
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
56
weather sealing
has bluetooth
includes touch to focus
megapixel count decent (20MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (600mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (1,095g)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus 8000
Landscape photography with Sony RX10 IV
35
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
manual focus not available
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
62
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
supports RAW formats
weather sealing
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 8000 as a Vlogging camera
Sony RX10 IV as a Vlogging camera
28
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of mic jack
29
rather wide (24mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
has external mic support
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
heavier than average in class (1,095 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus 8000 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 8000 and Sony RX10 IV
 Olympus Stylus Tough 8000Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV
Other name mju Tough 8000 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-07-01 2017-09-12
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 64 125
RAW pictures
Lowest enhanced ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 315
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing distance 2cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.9 2.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 1,440 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Min shutter speed 1/4s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Max silent shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shutter rate - 24.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/2000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 182 grams (0.40 pounds) 1095 grams (2.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 400 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse feature
Storage type xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $380 $1,698