Clicky

Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
93
Imaging
34
Features
14
Overall
26
Nikon Coolpix L22 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Nikon L22
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 37-134mm (F3.1-6.7) lens
  • 183g - 98 x 61 x 28mm
  • Released February 2010
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • New Model is Olympus VR-330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Lets look closer at the Nikon L22 versus Olympus VR-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the L22 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The L22 was revealed 17 months prior to the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a concise summary of how the L22 matches up against the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Nikon L22 over the Olympus VR-320

 L22 VR-320 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon L22

 VR-320 L22 
RevealedJuly 2011February 2010More modern by 17 months

Common features in the Nikon L22 and Olympus VR-320

 L22 VR-320 
Focus manually No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon L22 comes with external dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 183 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Look at the Nikon L22 versus Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the L22 and the VR-320.

Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the L22 and VR-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.

Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The image here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the L22 and VR-320.

Clearly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus VR-320 to render more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged L22 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon L22 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography highlights
20
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
33
MP count decent (14MP)
offers face detect focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Nikon L22
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
46
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (158 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Nikon L22 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
17
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Nikon L22 Travel photography details
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography details
50
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse function
low megapixels (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
70
lighter than average (158g)
MP count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Nikon L22 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography highlights
27
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
42
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not available
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon L22 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not the best (37mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone jack
32
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
lighter than average (158 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon L22 and Olympus VR-320
 Nikon Coolpix L22Olympus VR-320
General Information
Brand Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix L22 Olympus VR-320
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-02-03 2011-07-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Expeed C2 TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 37-134mm (3.6x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/3.1-6.7 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 183g (0.40 pounds) 158g (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 98 x 61 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $130 $179