Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320
93 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-134mm (F3.1-6.7) lens
- 183g - 98 x 61 x 28mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Lets look closer at the Nikon L22 versus Olympus VR-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the L22 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe L22 was revealed 17 months prior to the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a concise summary of how the L22 matches up against the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix L22 and Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are provided at Nikon L22 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L22 over the Olympus VR-320
| L22 | VR-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon L22
| VR-320 | L22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 | February 2010 | More modern by 17 months |
Common features in the Nikon L22 and Olympus VR-320
| L22 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon L22 comes with external dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 183 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Nikon L22 versus Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the L22 and the VR-320.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the L22 and VR-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The image here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the L22 and VR-320.
Clearly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus VR-320 to render more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged L22 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix L22 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix L22 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-02-03 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-134mm (3.6x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-6.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 183g (0.40 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 61 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $130 | $179 |