Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-330
93 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-134mm (F3.1-6.7) lens
- 183g - 98 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Nikon L22 versus Olympus VR-330, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the L22 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe L22 was introduced 12 months prior to the VR-330 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the L22 scores versus the VR-330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix L22 & Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are available at Nikon L22 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L22 over the Olympus VR-330
| L22 | VR-330 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Nikon L22
| VR-330 | L22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 12 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon L22 and Olympus VR-330
| L22 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon L22 has got outside measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 183 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon L22 versus Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the L22 versus the VR-330.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the L22 and VR-330 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The image below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the L22 and VR-330.
All in all, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus VR-330 to give greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged L22 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Nikon L22 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix L22 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix L22 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-02-03 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-134mm (3.6x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-6.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 183 grams (0.40 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 61 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $130 | $220 |