Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
93 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
![Nikon Coolpix L22 front Nikon Coolpix L22 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-L22/Nikon-L22-front.jpg)
![Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Pentax-Optio-WG-1-GPS/Pentax-WG-1-GPS-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-134mm (F3.1-6.7) lens
- 183g - 98 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched August 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Nikon and Pentax. The image resolution of the L22 (12MP) and the WG-1 GPS (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The L22 was manufactured 18 months prior to the WG-1 GPS which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the L22 matches up versus the WG-1 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix L22 and Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The entire galleries are available at Nikon L22 Gallery and Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L22 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
L22 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Nikon L22
WG-1 GPS | L22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 18 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Nikon L22 and Pentax WG-1 GPS
L22 | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon L22 provides external measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 183 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Pentax WG-1 GPS has measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the L22 against the WG-1 GPS.
![Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-L22-vs-Pentax-Optio-WG-1-GPS-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the L22 and WG-1 GPS is 93 and 93 respectively.
![Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-L22-vs-Pentax-Optio-WG-1-GPS-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The picture here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the L22 and WG-1 GPS.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Pentax WG-1 GPS to offer extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged L22 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
![Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-L22-vs-Pentax-Optio-WG-1-GPS-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-L22-vs-Pentax-Optio-WG-1-GPS-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon L22 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix L22 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Pentax |
Model | Nikon Coolpix L22 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-02-03 | 2011-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 37-134mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-6.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 183 grams (0.40 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 61 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $130 | $350 |