Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a81b/6a81b74be2fc2f5b005db0ba199900d1cad3b423" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 front"
91 Imaging
33 Features
25 Overall
29
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Released May 2009
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic ZS1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and ZS1 (10MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and ZS1 (1/2.5") have different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 II was announced 6 years later than the ZS1 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-M10 II grades against the ZS1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic ZS1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic ZS1
E-M10 II | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 77 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS1 over the Olympus E-M10 II
ZS1 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZS1
E-M10 II | ZS1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II features physical dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS1 has proportions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic ZS1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II and the ZS1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68a02/68a020fc2e9641fe4d41f163e09c3ab0df229ad2" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and ZS1 is 82 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83b05/83b05c5a6c58f3a56ea208388aa940429d3f371a" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and ZS1.
All in all, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II having a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will resolve more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5555/b55557ead8c37e3407b54f8aaca788ce26382d6a" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d899/6d8996227af8cddebcce581466d689ab57643bf6" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS1 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ6 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lb) | 229 grams (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $499 | $0 |