Nikon L22 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
93 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Nikon L22 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-134mm (F3.1-6.7) lens
- 183g - 98 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon L22 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Nikon L22 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the L22 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe L22 was announced 5 years before the WG-4 GPS and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the L22 matches up versus the WG-4 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon L22 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix L22 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The whole galleries are available at Nikon L22 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L22 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| L22 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Nikon L22
| WG-4 GPS | L22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 48 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon L22 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| L22 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Nikon L22 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Nikon L22 offers outside measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 183 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon L22 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the L22 vs the WG-4 GPS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the L22 and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Nikon L22 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the L22 and WG-4 GPS.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to deliver greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older L22 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon L22 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Nikon L22 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix L22 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix L22 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-02-03 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-134mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-6.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 183 grams (0.40 lbs) | 235 grams (0.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 61 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $130 | $210 |