Nikon L22 vs Samsung WB35F
93 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Nikon L22 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-134mm (F3.1-6.7) lens
- 183g - 98 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon L22 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Nikon L22 vs Samsung WB35F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the L22 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe L22 was announced 4 years before the WB35F and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the L22 matches up vs the WB35F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon L22 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix L22 & Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon L22 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L22 over the Samsung WB35F
| L22 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Nikon L22
| WB35F | L22 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 | February 2010 | Fresher by 47 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Nikon L22 and Samsung WB35F
| L22 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Nikon L22 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Nikon L22 has external dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 183 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon L22 vs Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the L22 and the WB35F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the L22 and WB35F is 93 and 93 respectively.
Nikon L22 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The visual below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the L22 and WB35F.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB35F to offer greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The older L22 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon L22 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Nikon L22 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix L22 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix L22 | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-02-03 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-134mm (3.6x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.7 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 183g (0.40 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 61 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $130 | $130 |