Nikon L24 vs Olympus TG-320
93 Imaging
37 Features
20 Overall
30
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Nikon L24 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-134mm (F3.1-6.7) lens
- 182g - 98 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon L24 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Nikon L24 vs Olympus TG-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the L24 (14MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe L24 was introduced 11 months earlier than the TG-320 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the L24 grades against the TG-320 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon L24 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix L24 and Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon L24 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L24 over the Olympus TG-320
| L24 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Nikon L24
| TG-320 | L24 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 11 months |
Common features in the Nikon L24 and Olympus TG-320
| L24 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Nikon L24 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon L24 offers physical dimensions of 98mm x 61mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon L24 vs Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the L24 compared to the TG-320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the L24 and TG-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Nikon L24 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The picture underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the L24 and TG-320.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of images but you may want to take the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged L24 will be behind in sensor technology.
Nikon L24 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon L24 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix L24 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix L24 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-02-09 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Expeed C2 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 37-134mm (3.6x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-6.7 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182g (0.40 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 61 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | 150 images |
| Style of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $119 | $0 |