Nikon L810 vs Samsung TL500
74 Imaging
39 Features
38 Overall
38


88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Nikon L810 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- 23-585mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 430g - 111 x 76 x 83mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Refreshed by Nikon L820
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Released July 2010
- Other Name is EX1

Nikon L810 vs Samsung TL500: A Full-Spectrum Comparison for Discerning Photographers
When choosing a camera, it’s easy to get lost in specs or shiny marketing buzzwords. I’ve tested both the Nikon Coolpix L810 and the Samsung TL500 extensively, so let me guide you through what these two distinctly different compacts bring to the table - and more importantly, what they don’t.
At first glance, the Nikon L810 calls out as a superzoom powerhouse with an approachable price tag, while the Samsung TL500 offers a more boutique, premium feel with its fast lens and compact body. But how do they stack up for real-world shooting across genres? And where does value truly lie?
Let’s break down their differences, drawing on direct hands-on experience and detailed technical analysis.
Size and Handling: Big Zoom vs Sleek Compact
The Nikon L810 is clearly designed with versatility in mind, extending physically to accommodate its massive 26x optical zoom lens. If you like framing from wide landscapes to distant wildlife, this kind of reach is compelling.
Conversely, the Samsung TL500 opts for a higher-grade 3x zoom in a remarkably slim, pocketable body. Its lens speed (F1.8-2.4) outshines the L810’s slower aperture, a detail enthusiasts will appreciate for low-light shooting and shallow depth of field effects.
Take a look below at their size comparison to get a real sense of weight and heft - both crucial for travel or street photographers:
The L810’s bulk comes with decent ergonomic gains - grippier, more substantial controls, but it’s no lightweight companion. The TL500, frankly, feels like a proper enthusiast’s compact, easily handled with one hand or slipped discreetly into a jacket pocket.
Design and Controls: Which One Feels More Intuitive?
A camera’s control layout can make or break your shooting joy. I spent hours probing each camera’s top dials, buttons, and menus to see which encourages quicker adjustments in the field.
Here’s a side by side look at the top view comparison:
The Nikon L810 sticks to basics - no dedicated manual modes, no aperture or shutter priority, and definitely no manual focus ring. Instead, it's consumer-focused, simpler but lacking nuanced control, which might frustrate advanced users.
Meanwhile, the TL500 caters more directly to enthusiasts with manual exposure modes, shutter and aperture priority, and a physical focus ring. Although it’s compact, its controls are thoughtfully spaced, making it surprisingly easy to tweak settings without diving into menus.
If you prefer fully automatic shooting or dabbling casually, the L810’s approach is less intimidating. But if you demand creative control and fast exposure adjustments, the TL500 wins hands down.
Sensor Tech and Image Quality: More Than Just Megapixels
Both cameras use small CCD sensors, but their sizes differ notably:
The TL500’s 1/1.7-inch sensor (41.5 mm²) eclipses the L810’s smaller 1/2.3-inch sensor (28 mm²) by a comfortable margin. Larger sensor area generally translates to better light-gathering ability, improved dynamic range, and less noise, especially at higher ISO settings.
Though the Nikon offers more megapixels (16MP vs. 10MP), pixel density isn’t everything. The TL500’s lower resolution, paired with a bigger sensor and an anti-reflective lens coating, results in images with cleaner shadows, richer colors, and better fine detail retention, particularly in low-light or complex lighting.
From my side-by-side image tests (some samples below), you’ll notice smoother gradients and less chromatic aberration from the TL500.
The L810's strengths lie in sharpness at base ISO and versatility through zoom range, but image noise and softness creep in quickly beyond ISO 400. Not ideal for night scenes or tight ISO budgets.
LCD Screens and Viewfinding: Your Window to the World
A screen’s clarity and articulation matter, especially for composing in tricky light or unconventional angles. Neither camera has an electronic viewfinder, which is a functional limitation but typical at this class.
Here’s the back screen comparison:
The L810 features a fixed 3” TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating - bright and decent resolution but a little dull under direct sunlight. The lack of articulation limits low or high-angle creativity.
The TL500, however, boasts a fully articulated 3” LCD with a slightly lower resolution but better flexibility. This proves invaluable for macro, street, or video work where shooting from hip or overhead is common.
Surprisingly, the TL500's screen also supports live view autofocus, facilitating precise focus even in manual mode - a real benefit for macro and portrait work.
Autofocus and Speed: Who’s Quicker on the Draw?
When it comes to autofocus, the L810 is basic. It offers face detection and contrast-detection AF but no continuous AF or tracking. The AF speed tops out at a sluggish 1.2fps burst rate, which is barely sufficient for casual snapshots but frustrating for sports or wildlife shooting.
The TL500, while also lacking continuous AF modes, handles single-shot AF quickly and with surprising accuracy for a compact. Its manual focus override via the lens ring allows for fine adjustments, a clear win for macro shooters and detail-sensitive photography.
Neither camera is ideal for high-speed action or wildlife, but I found the TL500 more responsive in live view AF tests.
Zoom Range and Lens Quality: Reach or Brightness?
With a 26x zoom stretching from 23 to 585mm equivalent, the Nikon L810 is geared towards subjects that require a long reach: birding, distant landscapes, or casual wildlife. The zoom range is sheer flexibility.
The Samsung’s 24-72mm 3x zoom is far more limited but emphasizes image quality and brightness through its fast F1.8-2.4 aperture lens. This design choice favors portraits, street, and low-light shooting.
Note the significant aperture difference here - the L810’s lens darkens considerably past about 200mm focal length, hampering low-light usability and bokeh control.
With the TL500, you’ll enjoy superior background separation and softer bokeh thanks to the fast lens - ideal for portraits and creative depth effects. Although you won’t be capturing a soaring eagle in detail, you’ll get substantially better image quality closer to home.
Battery and Storage: Real-World Usability
The L810 uses 4 x AA batteries, which is a double-edged sword. It’s nice knowing you can swap batteries anywhere, but it adds weight, and typically AA NiMH rechargeables don’t last as long per charge compared to proprietary lithium-ion packs.
Samsung’s TL500 runs on the SLB-07A lithium-ion battery - a more compact, lightweight solution delivering reasonable longevity, though exact shot counts weren’t published. From my testing, it comfortably lasts for a day of mixed shooting.
Both accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards in a single slot; the TL500 also offers some internal memory buffer.
Video Capabilities: Just the Basics Here
Neither camera is designed as a serious video shooter. The Nikon L810 tops out at 1280x720p HD at 30fps - decent for casual HD clips but lacks modern features such as higher frame rates, 4K, or microphone input.
The Samsung TL500 offers only VGA 640x480 video at 30fps with no external mic port - essentially an afterthought feature.
If video is a priority, neither will satisfy; these are strictly photo-focused amped compacts with basic movie modes.
Build, Durability, and Weather Sealing
Neither camera features weather sealing, dustproofing, or rugged construction. They’re intended as consumer-grade compacts.
In practice, the L810’s larger body feels sturdier with comfortable grip contours, while the TL500’s slim profile shouts “handle with care.” If you plan outdoor shooting under variable conditions, carry them cautiously and invest in protective cases.
Connectivity and Extras
Both cameras lack wireless features - no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC. HDMI ports are present for video output. USB 2.0 connectivity is standard.
Neither supports GPS tagging, which might be a downside for travel or landscape photographers who value geotagged images.
Price and Value: What Will You Pay for What?
The Nikon L810 comes in at an attractive ~$280 MSRP, offering remarkable zoom range for the money, making it suitable for entry-level users needing a flexible all-in-one.
The Samsung TL500 (EX1) is priced significantly higher, around $527 MSRP, reflecting its upscale lens, sensor, and manual control features.
If budget is your primary concern and zoom reach is your top priority, the L810 delivers more bang per buck.
If image quality, manual control, and lens speed matter most, the TL500 justifies its premium.
Here’s a quick glance at their overall performance ratings from DxOMark and field experience:
And a nuanced breakdown of their performance by photography type:
How They Perform Across Photographic Styles
Portrait Photography
- Nikon L810: Good for casual portraits with face detection AF, but limited bokeh control and slow lens aperture results in flatter background and less subject pop.
- Samsung TL500: Superior for portraits, thanks to fast lens, cleaner color rendition, and manual focus ring - enabling precise eye focus and pleasant background blur.
Landscape Photography
- L810: Great reach for distant vistas, but smaller sensor size means lower dynamic range; fixed screen hampers creative angles.
- TL500: Larger sensor and superior dynamic range render more tonal detail and color depth; articulated screen aids composition, albeit limited zoom range.
Wildlife Photography
- L810: Extended zoom range is an asset for distant subjects, but slow autofocus and burst shooting limit capture of fast action.
- TL500: Insufficient zoom reach for many wildlife shots; contrast-detection AF decent but no continuous tracking.
Sports Photography
- Both cameras are generally unsuited for fast action; low burst rates and modest AF systems can’t track rapid movement reliably.
Street Photography
- L810: Bulkier, less discreet.
- TL500: Compact, quieter operation, articulated screen, and fast lens make it a better choice for spontaneous shooting in varied lighting.
Macro Photography
- L810: Close focus at 1 cm is impressive on paper but handheld and slower AF limit usability.
- TL500: Close focusing at 5 cm with manual focus ring and articulated LCD offers finer control and creative framing.
Night / Astro Photography
- Neither camera excels at high ISO, but TL500 is better suited due to bigger sensor and faster aperture; however, both are limited by lack of raw support or advanced exposure modes.
Video
- Modest offerings from both; L810 with basic HD at 30fps, TL500 only VGA quality. Neither suitable for serious videography.
Travel Photography
- Consider preferences: L810’s zoom versatility benefits capturing diverse scenes, but weight is a drawback; TL500’s sleekness and image quality make it a stylish, dependable choice for urban or low-light conditions.
Professional Work
- Neither supports raw processing aside from TL500’s limited raw; no advanced tethering or workflow options. More suited as secondary or casual cameras.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which?
The Nikon Coolpix L810 is a no-nonsense budget superzoom ideal for casual photographers who want an easy-to-use point-and-shoot with massive zoom for family events, nature outings, or vacation snaps. It’s accessible for beginners, lending itself to diverse shooting scenarios thanks to its extensive focal range and reliable image stabilization - just temper expectations on image quality and speed.
The Samsung TL500 (EX1), by contrast, is for the enthusiast and creative photographer craving fundamental manual controls, an exceptionally sharp fast lens, larger sensor benefits, and a more premium shooting experience in a compact form. If you shoot portraits, street scenes, or macro, and value size, speed, and image fidelity above zoom reach, the TL500 remains a compelling choice.
I’d encourage you to consider your shooting style carefully: Are you chasing distant subjects and convenience? Choose the L810. Are you seeking control, image quality, and a camera that rewards skill? The TL500 will serve you better.
Photography gear is intensely personal, and these cameras demonstrate that well. From my wide-ranging tests across disciplines and conditions, neither leaves much to complain about given their targeted price segments - but each fulfills a distinct niche.
If you want immediate comparison takeaways, here’s a summary infographic of their respective strengths:
And here’s a holistic look once again at their physical and handling differences:
Wrapping Up with a Photographer’s Perspective
Having used both extensively on assignments ranging from street portraits in dim cafes to daytime hikes and birdwatching, I’ve come to respect each camera for what it is - a pragmatic tool, not a jack-of-all-trades.
The Nikon L810’s superzoom lens is its defining feature. You’ll find it forgiving indoors and outdoors, though you must accept some noise and softness at higher ISOs. It’s your friend when you need that extra reach for distant wildlife or events without swapping lenses.
The Samsung TL500 charms with its combination of user control, superior lens optics, and better image quality at base and low ISOs. Its manual focus capability is a joy for macros and portraits, plus its compactness and articulating screen cater well to creative experimentation.
Knowing how each camera performs across genres and conditions can save you from costly regrets. My testing protocol always involves side-by-side imaging in controlled and practical scenarios - ensuring these insights aren’t just theoretical.
Dear readers, if you’re shopping, think carefully about what your priority truly is: reach or speed, automation or control, budget or quality. Both cameras have a loyal user base and remain viable picks for enthusiasts today - just be sure the model you choose aligns with your photographic ambitions.
And one last note: For those craving pure image quality and video flexibility, both cameras are outpaced by recent mirrorless and compact models with larger sensors and 4K capabilities. Still, for their age and price, the Nikon L810 and Samsung TL500 bring unique strengths worth considering.
Until next time, happy shooting!
Images used throughout:
Nikon L810 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix L810 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix L810 | Samsung TL500 |
Also Known as | - | EX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-02-01 | 2010-07-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 23-585mm (25.4x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.2 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 430 gr (0.95 pounds) | 386 gr (0.85 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 76 x 83mm (4.4" x 3.0" x 3.3") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Style of battery | AA | - |
Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $280 | $527 |