Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11
67 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
![Nikon Coolpix L840 front Nikon Coolpix L840 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-L840/Nikon-L840-front.jpg)
![Olympus SZ-11 front Olympus SZ-11 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SZ-11/Olympus-SZ-11-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-855mm (F3.0-6.5) lens
- 538g - 114 x 89 x 96mm
- Released February 2015
- Succeeded the Nikon L830
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-500mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
- Revealed July 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 Overview
Let's look closer at the Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the L840 (16MP) and the SZ-11 (14MP) is pretty similar and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The L840 was released 3 years after the SZ-11 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Nikon L840 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SZ-11 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the L840 scores versus the SZ-11 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix L840 & Olympus SZ-11. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon L840 Gallery & Olympus SZ-11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L840 over the Olympus SZ-11
L840 | SZ-11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | July 2011 | More modern by 44 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-11 over the Nikon L840
SZ-11 | L840 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon L840 and Olympus SZ-11
L840 | SZ-11 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon L840 comes with external dimensions of 114mm x 89mm x 96mm (4.5" x 3.5" x 3.8") having a weight of 538 grams (1.19 lbs) and the Olympus SZ-11 has measurements of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the L840 vs the SZ-11.
![Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 size comparison Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-L840-vs-Olympus-SZ-11-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the L840 and SZ-11 is 67 and 89 respectively.
![Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 top view buttons comparison Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-L840-vs-Olympus-SZ-11-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes just by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the L840 and SZ-11.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Nikon L840 to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent L840 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
![Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 sensor size comparison Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-L840-vs-Olympus-SZ-11-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-L840-vs-Olympus-SZ-11-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Nikon L840 vs Olympus SZ-11 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix L840 | Olympus SZ-11 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix L840 | Olympus SZ-11 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-02-10 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 23-855mm (37.2x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.5 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 921k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.4 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.90 m (at Auto ISO) | 9.30 m (@ ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 538g (1.19 lbs) | 226g (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 89 x 96mm (4.5" x 3.5" x 3.8") | 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 590 pictures | 200 pictures |
Type of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $253 |