Nikon P1000 vs Olympus VR-320
49 Imaging
42 Features
67 Overall
52
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Nikon P1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-3000mm (F2.8-8) lens
- 1415g - 146 x 119 x 181mm
- Revealed July 2018
- Succeeded the Nikon P900
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon P1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Nikon P1000 vs Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the P1000 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very comparable and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe P1000 was brought out 7 years later than the VR-320 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Nikon P1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the P1000 grades versus the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon P1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix P1000 & Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon P1000 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P1000 over the Olympus VR-320
| P1000 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2018 | July 2011 | Fresher by 85 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display dimension | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon P1000
| VR-320 | P1000 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P1000 and Olympus VR-320
| P1000 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Nikon P1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon P1000 enjoys external measurements of 146mm x 119mm x 181mm (5.7" x 4.7" x 7.1") along with a weight of 1415 grams (3.12 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Nikon P1000 vs Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the P1000 against the VR-320.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the P1000 and VR-320 is 49 and 94 respectively.
Nikon P1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the P1000 and VR-320.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Nikon P1000 to produce greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent P1000 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Nikon P1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Nikon P1000 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P1000 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P1000 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2018-07-10 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Nikon Expeed | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-3000mm (125.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 99 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 1415g (3.12 lb) | 158g (0.35 lb) |
| Dimensions | 146 x 119 x 181mm (5.7" x 4.7" x 7.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I support) | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $1,000 | $179 |