Clicky

Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
44
Overall
38
Nikon Coolpix P300 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Nikon P300
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 160 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 189g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
  • Released May 2011
  • Updated by Nikon P310
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the P300 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The P300 was manufactured at a similar time to the VR-320 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the P300 matches up against the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Nikon P300 over the Olympus VR-320

 P300 VR-320 
Display resolution922k230kClearer display (+692k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon P300

 VR-320 P300 

Common features in the Nikon P300 and Olympus VR-320

 P300 VR-320 
ReleasedMay 2011July 2011Same generation
Manual focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon P300 provides outer dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 189 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Look at the Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the P300 against the VR-320.

Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the P300 and VR-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.

Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The visual below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the P300 and VR-320.

Plainly, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to render extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.

Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon P300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
27
includes face detection focus
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
33
megapixel count good (14MP)
comes with face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Nikon P300 Street photography information
Olympus VR-320 Street photography information
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Nikon P300
Sports photography with Olympus VR-320
37
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Nikon P300 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
63
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
does not have Time Lapse function
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
70
lighter than average in class (158g)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Nikon P300 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Landscape photography camera
43
rather wide (24mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
42
quite wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon P300 Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging advice
36
rather wide (24mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic support
32
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than average in class (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon P300 and Olympus VR-320
 Nikon Coolpix P300Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon Coolpix P300 Olympus VR-320
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2011-05-31 2011-07-19
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Expeed C2 TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 160 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-100mm (4.2x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Largest aperture f/1.8-4.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range 3cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 922 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech TFT-LCD with anti-reflection coating TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 7.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 6.50 m 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (15, 30fps), 1280 x 720p (15, 30, 60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 189 grams (0.42 lbs) 158 grams (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL12 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (10 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $500 $179