Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320
92 Imaging
35 Features
44 Overall
38
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 189g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Released May 2011
- Updated by Nikon P310
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the P300 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe P300 was manufactured at a similar time to the VR-320 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the P300 matches up against the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix P300 and Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon P300 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P300 over the Olympus VR-320
| P300 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Nikon P300
| VR-320 | P300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P300 and Olympus VR-320
| P300 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2011 | July 2011 | Same generation | |
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon P300 provides outer dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 189 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the P300 against the VR-320.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the P300 and VR-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The visual below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the P300 and VR-320.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to render extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon P300 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P300 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix P300 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-05-31 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 160 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-100mm (4.2x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD with anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (15, 30fps), 1280 x 720p (15, 30, 60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 189 grams (0.42 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $500 | $179 |