Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5
92 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
![Nikon Coolpix P310 front Nikon Coolpix P310 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-P310/Nikon-P310-front.jpg)
![Ricoh CX5 front Ricoh CX5 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-CX5/Ricoh-CX5-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 194g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Released June 2012
- Earlier Model is Nikon P300
- Updated by Nikon P330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Nikon P310 versus Ricoh CX5, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Nikon and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the P310 (16MP) and CX5 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The P310 was brought out 12 months after the CX5 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the P310 grades against the CX5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P310 and Ricoh CX5. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon P310 Gallery and Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P310 over the Ricoh CX5
P310 | CX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 12 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Nikon P310
CX5 | P310 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P310 and Ricoh CX5
P310 | CX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon P310 offers outer dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Ricoh CX5 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon P310 versus Ricoh CX5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the P310 versus the CX5.
![Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 size comparison Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P310-vs-Ricoh-CX5-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the P310 and CX5 is 92 and 92 respectively.
![Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 top view buttons comparison Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P310-vs-Ricoh-CX5-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specs. The pic below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the P310 and CX5.
All in all, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Nikon P310 to resolve greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The younger P310 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
![Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 sensor size comparison Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P310-vs-Ricoh-CX5-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P310-vs-Ricoh-CX5-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P310 | Ricoh CX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix P310 | Ricoh CX5 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-06-22 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 99 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-100mm (4.2x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $700 | $399 |