Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6
92 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
![Nikon Coolpix P310 front Nikon Coolpix P310 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-P310/Nikon-P310-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-6 front Ricoh WG-6 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-6/Ricoh-WG-6-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 194g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Launched June 2012
- Replaced the Nikon P300
- Refreshed by Nikon P330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Let's look closer at the Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the P310 (16MP) and the WG-6 (20MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The P310 was introduced 6 years prior to the WG-6 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the P310 scores versus the WG-6 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix P310 and Ricoh WG-6. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon P310 Gallery and Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P310 over the Ricoh WG-6
P310 | WG-6 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Nikon P310
WG-6 | P310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | ![]() | June 2012 | More modern by 69 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper screen (+119k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon P310 and Ricoh WG-6
P310 | WG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Nikon P310 has got exterior measurements of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-6 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the P310 compared to the WG-6.
![Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 size comparison Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P310-vs-Ricoh-WG-6-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the P310 and WG-6 is 92 and 89 respectively.
![Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 top view buttons comparison Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P310-vs-Ricoh-WG-6-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out a spec sheet. The pic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the P310 and WG-6.
Clearly, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Ricoh WG-6 to produce greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged P310 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 sensor size comparison Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P310-vs-Ricoh-WG-6-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
![Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Nikon-Coolpix-P310-vs-Ricoh-WG-6-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P310 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix P310 | Ricoh WG-6 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2012-06-22 | 2018-02-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 99 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-100mm (4.2x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | Flash on, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps) | 3840x2160 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 246 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 230 shots | 340 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $700 | $271 |