Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-M1
92 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 194g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Announced June 2012
- Succeeded the Nikon P300
- Updated by Nikon P330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Nikon P310 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the P310 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe P310 was introduced 3 years before the WG-M1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the P310 grades vs the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix P310 & Ricoh WG-M1. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon P310 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P310 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| P310 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+806k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Nikon P310
| WG-M1 | P310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | June 2012 | Newer by 27 months |
Common features in the Nikon P310 and Ricoh WG-M1
| P310 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and size. The Nikon P310 has exterior measurements of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Nikon P310 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the P310 vs the WG-M1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the P310 and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specifications. The picture here might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the P310 and WG-M1.
To sum up, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Nikon P310 to give you more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged P310 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon P310 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P310 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P310 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-06-22 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 99 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-100mm (4.2x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120, 30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 230 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $700 | $2,000 |