Nikon P330 vs Olympus 6020
92 Imaging
36 Features
48 Overall
40
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Nikon P330 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F1.8-5.6) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Introduced March 2013
- Succeeded the Nikon P310
- New Model is Nikon P340
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Nikon P330 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Nikon P330 versus Olympus 6020, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the P330 (12MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is pretty comparable but the P330 (1/1.7") and 6020 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe P330 was revealed 3 years later than the 6020 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the P330 grades versus the 6020 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon P330 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix P330 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are provided at Nikon P330 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P330 over the Olympus 6020
| P330 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 | February 2010 | More recent by 38 months | |
| Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Nikon P330
| 6020 | P330 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P330 and Olympus 6020
| P330 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Nikon P330 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon P330 comes with outer dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon P330 versus Olympus 6020 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the P330 compared to the 6020.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the P330 and 6020 is 92 and 95 respectively.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through specifications. The photograph underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the P330 and 6020.
To sum up, both cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The P330 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus 6020 will provide extra detail because of its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher P330 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon P330 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P330 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix P330 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
| Also called | - | mju Tough 6020 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-03-04 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.50 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720p (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 200 grams (0.44 lb) | 122 grams (0.27 lb) |
| Dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 213 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $500 | $279 |