Nikon P330 vs Olympus XZ-10

Here, we will be analyzing the Nikon P330 vs Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the P330 (12MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is relatively similar but the P330 (1/1.7") and XZ-10 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The P330 was announced 2 months later than the XZ-10 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the P330 grades against the XZ-10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P330 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are available at Nikon P330 Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.

When you are planning to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon P330 provides exterior measurements of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).

Analyze the Nikon P330 vs Olympus XZ-10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the P330 versus the XZ-10.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the P330 and XZ-10 is 92 and 91 respectively.

Often, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The graphic here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the P330 and XZ-10.

All in all, the two cameras feature the identical resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The P330 features the bigger sensor which will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult.