Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
92 Imaging
37 Features
48 Overall
41
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F1.8-5.6) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Released March 2013
- Old Model is Nikon P310
- Successor is Nikon P340
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the P330 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable but the P330 (1/1.7") and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's DominanceThe P330 was revealed 13 months later than the TG-820 iHS which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the P330 matches up vs the TG-820 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P330 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon P330 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P330 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
P330 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2013 | February 2012 | Fresher by 13 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Nikon P330
TG-820 iHS | P330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | 921k | Crisper screen (+109k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon P330 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
P330 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon P330 enjoys external dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the P330 and the TG-820 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the P330 and TG-820 iHS is 92 and 92 respectively.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out technical specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the P330 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The P330 has got the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF simpler. The younger P330 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P330 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P330 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P330 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-03-04 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT-LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.50 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720p (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 200 gr (0.44 lbs) | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 213 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | 220 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $500 | $500 |