Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-330
92 Imaging
36 Features
48 Overall
40
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F1.8-5.6) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
- Revealed March 2013
- Old Model is Nikon P310
- Refreshed by Nikon P340
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Nikon P330 versus Olympus VR-330, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Nikon and Olympus. The resolution of the P330 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very well matched but the P330 (1/1.7") and VR-330 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe P330 was manufactured 2 years after the VR-330 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the P330 matches up vs the VR-330 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix P330 and Olympus VR-330. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon P330 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P330 over the Olympus VR-330
| P330 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2013 | February 2011 | More modern by 26 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Nikon P330
| VR-330 | P330 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon P330 and Olympus VR-330
| P330 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Nikon P330 features physical measurements of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon P330 versus Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the P330 and the VR-330.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the P330 and VR-330 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The pic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the P330 and VR-330.
Clearly, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The P330 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus VR-330 will give greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger P330 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon P330 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix P330 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix P330 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-03-04 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.50 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720p (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Optional | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 200 gr (0.44 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 213 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $500 | $220 |